@article {50432,
	title = {Bridging historical and ecological approaches in biogeography},
	journal = {Australian Systematic Botany},
	volume = {19},
	year = {2006},
	note = {//Other//None//entered 08/14/2007},
	month = {2006},
	pages = {1-10},
	abstract = {The practice of biogeography is rooted in disciplines that traditionally have had little intellectual exchange and yielded two complementary biogeographic approaches: ecological and historical biogeography. This paper reviews alternative biogeographic approaches in the context of spatial analysis. Biogeography can be used to set priorities for conservation of biological diversity, but also to design strategies to control biological invasions and vectors of human diseases, to provide information about the former distribution of species, and to guide development of ecological restoration initiatives, among other applications. But no one of these applications could be fully carried out until an integrative framework on biogeography, which bridges biogeographical historical and ecological paths of thinking, has been developed.  Although we do not propose a new biogeographic method, we highlight the causes and consequences of the lack of a conceptual framework integrating ecology and history in biogeography, and how this required framework would allow biogeography to be fully utilized in fields such as conservation.},
	keywords = {article, biogeography, ecological approaches, biogeography, historical approaches, historical approaches, biogeography, journal},
	author = {Crisci, Jorge and O. E. Sala and Katinas, Liliana and Possadas, Paula}
}
